<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Posting Tools (Zempt, w.bloggar)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opdahls.com/2005/01/04/posting-tools-zempt-wbloggar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opdahls.com/2005/01/04/posting-tools-zempt-wbloggar/</link>
	<description>Where I Grumble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://opdahls.com/2005/01/04/posting-tools-zempt-wbloggar/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7#comment-6</guid>
		<description>OK -- We&#039;re up to 1.2.2 now and using the standard xmlrpc.php file in the WordPress distribution. Now...will w.bloggar work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8212; We&#8217;re up to 1.2.2 now and using the standard xmlrpc.php file in the WordPress distribution. Now&#8230;will w.bloggar work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://opdahls.com/2005/01/04/posting-tools-zempt-wbloggar/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7#comment-5</guid>
		<description>JR:

Well, they may have had it in there when it was originally released, but the 1.2.1 disty I have doesn&#039;t have it included. Unfortunately, I cannot remember where I got it and a quick check to WordPress.org shows that the 1.2.2 contains the file. I&#039;m glad they fixed the problem, and I now I&#039;m perplexed why I didn&#039;t have the 1.2.2 version to begin with...Time to upgrade already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR:</p>
<p>Well, they may have had it in there when it was originally released, but the 1.2.1 disty I have doesn&#8217;t have it included. Unfortunately, I cannot remember where I got it and a quick check to WordPress.org shows that the 1.2.2 contains the file. I&#8217;m glad they fixed the problem, and I now I&#8217;m perplexed why I didn&#8217;t have the 1.2.2 version to begin with&#8230;Time to upgrade already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://opdahls.com/2005/01/04/posting-tools-zempt-wbloggar/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 06:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter

Just to make sure that the WordPress guys don&#039;t get wrongly accused: In fact, they did include the &lt;code&gt;xmlrpc.php&lt;/code&gt; in WordPress 1.2 &lt;em&gt;but&lt;/em&gt; it was lacking some functionality regarding the implementation. My &lt;code&gt;xmlrpc.php&lt;/code&gt; is a drop-in replacement for the original one -- 90% of the code are the same.

jr (Author of the patch)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter</p>
<p>Just to make sure that the WordPress guys don&#8217;t get wrongly accused: In fact, they did include the <code>xmlrpc.php</code> in WordPress 1.2 <em>but</em> it was lacking some functionality regarding the implementation. My <code>xmlrpc.php</code> is a drop-in replacement for the original one &#8212; 90% of the code are the same.</p>
<p>jr (Author of the patch)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://opdahls.com/2005/01/04/posting-tools-zempt-wbloggar/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hmm...I don&#039;t like the way that the italicized words get the same color as the live links. Time to poke into the CSS file for the first time. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;I don&#8217;t like the way that the italicized words get the same color as the live links. Time to poke into the CSS file for the first time. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
